Posts Tagged ‘painting’

L'Empereur
‘L’Empereur’ by James Carroll Beckwith (1852-1917). From the Public Domain Graphics email list.

James Carroll Beckwith was an American painter, who studied at the Chicago Academy of Design until it was destroyed by fire in 1871. He then studied in New York at the National Academy of Design. Beckwith traveled to Paris in 1873 and stayed there 5 years; it was during that time that he painted this picture of the sun setting on a statue.

Beckwith lived and worked mostly in the United States, where he was a well-known, successful, and often exhibited artist. He did return to Europe several times, including a four year stay in Italy from 1910-1914. He died of a heart attack at age 66 in New York City in 1917.
Click on the image to see it / down load it full-sized.
Peace,
Bekka
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Signing of the Declaration of Independence
‘The Signing of the Declaration of Independence’, by John Trumbull (1756-1843), 1819. From Wikipedia Commons.

Happy 4th of July!!

In keeping with the holiday, today’s Daily Public Domain image is of a painting by John Trumbull (1756-1843). It shows an idealized gathering of the signers of the Declaration (when in actuality not all of them signed on the same day). There are two versions of this painting, both by Trumbull. This one, which is slightly rougher and less polished, hangs in the Yale University Art Gallery, in New Haven, CT. The other hangs in the U.S. Capitol building.

Click on the image to see it / download it full-sized. I found this image on Wikipedia Commons.

And have a safe and happy 4th!

Peace,

Bekka

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Preening Peacock by Jehan Georges Vibert
‘The Preening Peacock’, date unknown, pre-1902. Painted by Jehan Georges Vibert (1840-1902). From Wikipedia Commons.

Speaking of subtle and not-so-subtle insults and other messages in art (see my post 2 days ago), consider this more modern example by a Victorian French painter, Jehan Georges Vibert. Whom does the title refer, really? To the bird or the man?

Vibert made a number of paintings depicting churchmen – from monks to cardinals. Some of them were just vignettes of clerical life; but others had some subtle anti-clerical messages, particularly in regard to the rich lifestyle many higher ranking (bishop / cardinal) French clerics had.

This is just one of the more blatant commentaries on wealthy clerics that Vibert painted, which sometimes led to difficulties getting his work exhibited.

Click on the picture to see it/ download it full-sized.

Peace,

Bekka
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Detail of Sistine Chapel Ceiling by Michelangelo

Detail of the Sistine Chapel ceiling showing God creating the sun and moon and stars, Michelangelo Buonarroti (1475-1564), 1508x1512. From Wikipedia Commons.

Okay, okay, I hope that title doesn’t upset anyone. I’m not trying to be disrespectful to the Pope or the Church, I’m just wanting to show everyone some interesting things that Michelangelo included on the Sistine Chapel ceiling. A little back history before I go into the explanations about the pictures here.

Michelangelo was a sculptor by trade and preference. He did notl ike to paint, and before the Sistine Chapel, he had never done fresco work. When the Pope arranged for him to be the one to paint the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, he was truly upset. He ended up spending four years standing on a scaffolding, tilting his head back (contrary to popular belief, he didn’t paint lying down) to see what he was working on overhead. He had neck, back, and vision problems the rest of his life after he finished the ceiling.

To top it all off, Michelangelo despised Pope Julius II. This particular pope was the nephew of the previous pope who had rebuilt the Cappella Magna, Sixtus IV. The Cappella Magna became known instead as the Cappella Sistina – ‘Sixus’ Chapel’ or Sistine Chapel. Sixtus IV also had a long standing feud with the Florentine rulers – specifically Lorenzo de’Medici, known to history as ‘Lorenzo the Magnificent’. Sixtus had been in on an attempt to assassinate Lorenzo and his brother Giuliano, which resulted in Giuliano’s death. (Read more about that incident – the Pazzi Conspiracy- on Wikipedia.)

Michelangelo was a Florentine. Lorenzo the Magnificent had virtually adopted the sculptor as a son when Michelangelo was in his early teens. Michelangelo studied with the same tutors that Lorenzo’s children did. He was extremely loyal to the de’Medici family. The de’Medici’s never forgave Pope Sixtus IV for his role in the conspiracy. And now, in 1508, Pope Sixtus’ nephew, Pope Julius II, was insisting (in a way Michelangelo could not turn down) that Michelangelo fresco the whole ceiling (all 1200 square feet of it) of the chapel built by Pope Sixtus! Needless to say, Michelangelo was not happy.

And now to our picture above:  By the time Michelangelo got to this section of the ceiling, he’d been up on that ceiling for nearly 4 years. He had painted the frescoes in backwards order – they depict events from Genesis, including the acts of Creation and Noah and the flood. He started on the end opposite the altar (the ‘back’ of the chapel) and worked towards the altar. So, he did Noah first. By the time he got to the fresco of God creating the sun and moon and stars, he was nearly over the altar area, and had been up on the ceiling for almost 4 years.

The prophet Zacharias from the Sistine Chapel by Michelangelo

Fresco of the Prophet Zacharias, with the face of Pope Julius II, from the Sisting Chapel ceiling by Michelangelo (1475-1564), 1508x1512. From Wikipedia Commons.

So when he painted God the Father (whom he depicted in typical Renaissance fashion as an old man in flowing robes) creating the moon, he positioned God so he was facing away from the viewer. He then painted God’s robes to cling to His behind – thus giving the image of God ‘mooning’ the viewer while creating the moon! (Look closely at the left side of the image above – it’s quite clear!) Of course, the specific viewer he had in mind was Pope Julius II, who would be saying Mass nearly under this fresco!

 But this is not the only insult Michelangelo inserted into the frescoes on the ceiling! Right over the door that Pope Julius II would enter in the back of the chapel when he entered to say Mass, he painted one of the seven prophets of the ceilings scheme – the prophet Zacharias. This prophet was a favorite of Pope Julius, and it appears that Michelangelo was flattering him because he painted Zacharias face as that of Pope Julius!

But he left a subtle insult, pretty much invisible from the floor and thus missed by the Pope when he viewed the fresco. But silently, Michelangelo made his true feelings about this ‘frescoing the ceiling’ thing. Behind the prophet-with-the-pope’s-face are two putti, those little fat angel children you see in lots of Renaissance paintings and frescoes. One has his arm resting on the shoulder of the other. Look closely at his hand – he has it closed into a fist with his thumb inserted between his index finger and his middle finger, and peeking out slightly. This gesture was a very very rude one in Italy at the time Michelangelo lived. It is the Renaissance equivalent of giving someone ‘the finger’. So here, quietly, Michelangelo, through his fresco, is giving Pope Julius II ‘the finger’!

Cumaean Sibyl from the Sistene Chapel ceiling
Cumaean Sibyl, from the Sistene Chapel ceiling frescoes, by Michelangelo (1475-1564), 1508×1512.

Amazingly, Michelangelo did not just give Pope Julius ‘the finger’ in his frescoes once, but twice. This last image is of the Cumaean Sibyl, the ancient oracle that was associated with the city of Rome. Since to Michelangelo, Rome equaled the papacy and his unwanted labors on the ceiling of the chapel, here he has putti again. And again, one has his arm around the other and the hand on the shoulder of the other putti is making the thumb between the fingers gesture. You have to look closely at the image here to see it, but it’s there.

This particular fresco looks down on the spot in the middle of the chapel where the pope would kneel on his way to the altar in the front to say Mass.
I hope I didn’t offend anyone. I simply wanted to amuse you, and point out that in art – especially Renaissance art – there are often subtle messages. Artists were not expected or allowed to sign their works (one of the reasons who painted what is sometimes hotly debated), so they often put self portraits into their paintings or other subtle symbols to ‘sign’ their works. Sometimes they would include symbolic insults, especially if they were unhappy with their patron or the work (as seen above).
On a side note – Michelangelo only signed one of his works – his famous Pieta.In order to sign it, he broke into the Papal Palace one night, and hastily chiseled his name into the sash the Virgin has over her robes. He only did this – and got in trouble for it too! – because people were talking about the wonderful sculpture but insisting it was by a Roman sculptor. Michelangelo was a proud Florentine sculptor, so he broke in and chiseled the message that ‘Michelangelo, a Florentine, made this’ on the Virgin’s sash!
Click on any of the image to see them full sized.
Peace,
Bekka
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comet moth
Argema mittrei, or ‘comet moth’. Illustration by Adolphe Millot (1857-1921), c. 1905. From Wikipedia Commons.

Today’s Public Domain image is of a beautiful comet moth. This is taken from an illustration for the Le Petit Larousse Illustré, a French reference book published in 1905. It was compiled and published by Pierre Larousse, and bears his name. It is both a dictionary and an encyclopedia. [There was a revival of it in 2005, the 100th anniversary. A modern Petit Larousse 2007 was published in 2006.]

Many of the natural history illlustrations for the 1905 edition were done by Adolphe Philippe Millot,  who was a French painter, lithographer and entomologist (someone who studies insects). He was the senior illustrator at Muséum National D’histoire Naturelle (the National Museum of Natural History) of France.
His illustrations of moths and butterflies are especially beautiful. This particular illustration was originally part of a larger page showing a wide variety of moths and butterflies.
The agrema mittrei, or ‘Madagascaran Comet Moth’, is a variety of African moon moth and the one of world’s largest moths, with a wing span of 20 cm [8 inches]. It is an endangered species, living in the wild only on Madagascar (as the name implies) though they have been bred in captivity. As a caterpillar it feeds only eucalyptus leaves. It then makes a silk cocoon that has holes in it to prevent the caterpillar / moth from drowning when it rains during the two to six months they are in it!  After this long time in the cocoon, the adult moths only live 4 or 5 days, and can only reproduce on the first day!  (Thus one of the reasons it is hard to breed them in captivity, though a few zoos have been successful…)
Click on the image to see / download it full-sized.
Peace,
Bekka
P.S. I welcome comments on the illustrations in my blog and emails about images you might like to see. There will be a delay before your comment appears because I have to ‘approve’ it – otherwise this blog would be filled with spam [I keep getting online casinos trying to automatically leave blog comments that I have to trash]. So give me a day and it should appear. I won’t trash you even for a negative comment either – only for swearing or obvious spam. – B
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Lord of the Manor
‘The Lord of the Manor’ by Edmund Blair Leighton (1853-1922). From Wikipedia Commons.

As you’ve probably realized by now, if you’ve read my blog any length of time, Edmund Blair Leighton is one of my favorite artists. I thought this painting by him to be wonderfully appropriate for Mother’s Day. It’s called ‘The Lord of the Manor’. (I found this image on Wikipedia Commons.)

My kids are giving me a very nice Mother’s Day – I hope those of you who are mothers, grandmothers, and aunts are also having a nice one.
Click the image to view / download it full-sized.
Peace,
Bekka
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Beauty in a Black Kimono - Edo Period Print
‘Beauty in a Black Kimono’, c. 1710-1720 by Torii Kiyonobu (1664-1729). Found on Wikipedia Commons.

Okay, I’m back. It’s been a long week. I have recovered from having abscessed teeth, an infection, and turning 42. Okay, you don’t exactly ‘recover’ from turning another year older, but since birthdays have never really bothered me, it actually helped me feel better. Besides, according to Douglas Adams’ Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy series, I am now ‘the answer’. Just don’t ask me what the question is. *grin*

Today’s image is artwork by one of the great Japanese printmakers of the Edo period, Torii Kiyonobu I, who, along with his father, was one of the founders of the Torii style / school of painting. I found this lady to be elegant and mysterious, which, I have to admit, is how I wish I was. I haven’t exactly reached that goal, but it never hurts to dream.
Torii Kiyonobu was born around 1664 in Osaka, the second son of actor and painter Torii Kiyomoto. He and his father moved to Edo
(modern day Tokoyo) around 1688, where Kiyonobu established himself as a painter and printmaker. The Torii school has had an association from the beginning, which continues to the present day, with the kabuki theaters. Much of Kiyomoto’s style is bold, partially because much of his work was posters and other material for the theaters.
Torii Kiyonobu’s son was also a printmaker and had the same name, and so they are refered to as Torii Kiyonobu I and II to differentiate them.
There is a brief article about him on the English Wikipedia, which you can read here.
Peace,
Bekka
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Portrait of a Young Woman
“Portrait of a Young Woman” by Gustave Jean Jacquet (1846-1909), date of painting unknown. From the Public Domain Graphics email list.

Here is a portrait of a lovely young woman by Victorian French artist Gustave Jean Jacquet (1846-1909). I got this from one of my (rather quiet) email lists – Public Domain Art. I have no date for the painting or even who the beautiful lady is, but it was certainly painted before 1909 and thus is public domain. Enjoy!

Click on the image to see it / download it full-sized.
Peace,
Bekka
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Easter Sunday Procession 1898
Easter Sunday Procession in St. Mark’s (1898) by Maurice Prendergast (1858-1924). From Wikipedia Commons.

Maurice Prendergast was born in Newfoundland, Canada, but is considered an American painter because his family moved to Boston when he was still a young boy. He was apprenticed when still a boy to a commerical painter, and this influenced his later style. He is known for his post-impressionist paintings that in some ways resemble mosaics, with clearly defined sections of pale watercolors.

You can read more about Prendergast and his art in the Wikipedia article about him.
Click to view / download this image of his painting of an Easter procession full-sized.
Peace,
Bekka
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Agnus Dei
Agnus Dei in the apse of St. Josef Church in Sehne-Bolzum, Germany. From Wikipedia Commons.

As I think I have explained before, the term ‘Agnus Dei’ means ‘Lamb of God’ in Latin, and refers to Christ. It is also a reference to the Eucharist – because in a Catholic mass, after the consecration, the priest presents the Eucharist to the congregation, proclaiming: ‘Behold the Lamb of God Who takes away the sins of the world’. It is also a reference to Revelation, where John the Evangelist speaks of seeing the ‘adoration of the Lamb’.

The image above incorporates elements of all this: It depicts a lamb with a cruciform halo (a halo with three stripes like the arms of a cross) which is used to symbolize deity; as well a flag with a cross, symbolizing Christ’s victory through the Cross. Blood from a wound flows into a chalice at the lambs feet, symbolizing the Eucharist. The lamb itself represents a spotless sacrifice – the First-Born of God, Who was without sin.
Yes, it’s very very heavy symbolism. But also very appropriate for Easter. Even if you aren’t Christian, understanding this symbolism will help you understand such works of art as Jan van Eyck’s ‘Ghent Altarpiece’. Click to see it/ download it full-sized.
Peace,
Bekka
  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,